
The Operator’s Playbook
Issue 009 · September 8, 2026
Every reduction I’ve ever been part of over thirty years has arrived with a word attached, and the word is almost always rebuild. We are repositioning, getting leaner so we can invest where it matters, rebuilding around our strengths. The word isn’t chosen to deceive, but because it’s the version of the truth a room can survive hearing. It lets the board approve it, the team absorb it, and the person saying it believe there’s a future on the other side of the pain. I have used the word, more than once, and I have been handed the word to carry, and those are the same story told from two different seats.
Most of the time, you’re not the one who chose the reduction, and it’s easy to forget that everyone has a boss. But you’re the one who has to carry it. Now you’re standing in front of a team that’s watching your face for the truth your slides aren’t allowed to say, holding a word you were given, doing the quiet math in the back of your mind that will tell you whether it’s real. That quiet math isn’t dread. It’s the most useful instrument you have, because it will tell you the truth long before anyone announces it, and knowing early is the whole difference between leading this and getting blindsided by it.
You already know the first thing that happens, because you’ve lived it. People panic, not only the ones who were cut but the ones who were kept, because a reduction is the clearest signal a business ever sends about where it currently is, and the best people read it fastest. You watch a few of them go, good people leaving under their own power for somewhere that feels less like a receding tide. This second wave decides itself, and now the team you planned to rebuild around is smaller than anyone actually chose.
The first thing the math tells you is something you can read from exactly where you sit. When one of those good people leaves on their own, watch what the business does with the empty chair. If it treats the chair as a hole, someone is urgently trying to fill it, because you were genuinely meant to build around that person, and that’s the tell of a real rebuild. If it treats the chair as upside, the seat stays empty and the saved salary quietly drops to the bottom line as the reduction beating its plan, and that’s the tell of something else. One departure, read honestly, tells you which story you’re in.
The second thing the math tells you is slower, and it’s the one to watch for, because if you don’t, it sets before you notice. When people leave partway through the year, the business carries their cost for only part of the year, so the year can land lighter than a full year would. If that lighter number becomes the run rate, it becomes the line next year gets measured against. And if that happens, refilling the roles you were promised starts to read as spending more than last year, which is a margin hit someone has to stand up and defend. That’s the moment the rebuild is quietly at risk, not because anyone killed it, but because the baseline moved under it while everyone was still looking at the words. You can usually see this coming months before it’s admitted out loud, and that head start is the whole point of doing the math.
I have stood in that spot on both sides of it. I have set a run rate, and I have been handed one and asked to build back over it. Getting over a new run rate isn’t automatic, and it’s not a given. It’s a fight, and it’s uphill, and you don’t win it by saying rebuild louder or leading with conviction. You win it with facts and receipts. The number moved, so you bring the number back: the business case, the cost of leaving the seat empty, the revenue it’s quietly walking out the door, the risk that compounds every month the role stays open. The business always keeps its real answer in the numbers, which is exactly why the numbers are what win it back. Bring better ones than the ones that set the baseline.
You don’t win a moved baseline with conviction. You win it with facts and receipts.
The early read matters for one reason. Knowing before the announcement buys you the one thing panic takes from everyone else, which is time. Time to plan, time to fight the run rate while there’s still runway to fight it, and time to level with your people before the word disappears out from under them. The ones who get hurt worst are the ones who believed the word until the day it was gone, because no one gave them a chance to get ready. You can give them that chance, because you did the math and you saw it coming.
So you get to make real choices while there’s still time to make them. If the chair is a hole and the build is funded, this is a genuine rebuild, and you lean your whole weight into it, because a real rebuild is one of the best things you’ll ever get to lead. If the chair is upside and the run rate has set, you take your shot at building back over it with everything I just described, and if you can’t win that fight, you stop spending your credibility defending a build that isn’t coming and spend it on the people in front of you instead. You tell them the truth in the register you’re allowed to tell it. You protect your strongest people by being honest about what you can and can’t promise. You pick the few things worth funding out of your own discretion, and you fight for those. And you refuse to set yourself or your team on fire performing a future the numbers have already closed.
None of that is losing. The operator who reads the arithmetic early and leads from it keeps the two things a reduction usually costs people, their own integrity and their team’s trust, because they were the one who saw it coming and acted like it instead of looking away. That’s not a small thing to hand the people who stayed. Some years it’s the most important thing you’ll give them.
The words will always say rebuild. The baseline will always tell the truth.
See you every other Tuesday.
~ Alicia
P.S. I built a companion to this one, the Rebuild or Bleed Test. It takes the two tells from this issue, the empty chair and the run rate, and turns them into ten, so you can read where your own reduction actually sits, early enough to still do something about it. It’s free, and it’s below.
How Jennifer Aniston’s LolaVie brand grew sales 40% with CTV ads
For its first CTV campaign, Jennifer Aniston’s DTC haircare brand LolaVie had a few non-negotiables. The campaign had to be simple. It had to demonstrate measurable impact. And it had to be full-funnel.
LolaVie used Roku Ads Manager to test and optimize creatives — reaching millions of potential customers at all stages of their purchase journeys. Roku Ads Manager helped the brand convey LolaVie’s playful voice while helping drive omnichannel sales across both ecommerce and retail touchpoints.
The campaign included an Action Ad overlay that let viewers shop directly from their TVs by clicking OK on their Roku remote. This guided them to the website to buy LolaVie products.
Discover how Roku Ads Manager helped LolaVie drive big sales and customer growth with self-serve TV ads.
The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.
Introducing The First Agentic CRM
Get revenue agents, workflows, and automations across every stage of your motion. Access customer data in real time through Attio's web app, MCP, API, and SDK.
Then Ask Attio anything about your business and get instant answers.
It's the CRM that runs the work behind every win.



